- #AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER DRIVERS#
- #AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER UPDATE#
- #AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER DRIVER#
- #AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER FULL#
- #AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER SERIES#
If you do that, HP's QuickLaunch application will blue screen.
#AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER DRIVER#
You can't use ATI's official driver without hacking it first with Mobility Modder.
#AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER DRIVERS#
DisplayLink drivers are the worst on the planet and conflict with HP's video driver. So that leaves USB-based DisplayLink adapters. The laptop has an analog and HDMI output, but you can't use both at the same time. apriest - Thursday, Janulink I have spent the last two months in driver hell trying to get two external monitors hooked up to an HP 4510s laptop with a ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 for an accounting firm.But then drivers have only really been important if you're running high-end solutions, which is less than 5% of the laptop market. Unfortunately, all we have are some figures from ATI regarding gaming performance, and until we see updated driver plans we won't know what to expect in terms of compatibility. What we really want to know is if performance and compatibility are going to be where we want. Okay, enough talk about the past let's look at what AMD is announcing today. If that's all you need, or if you don't even need gaming performance and are just interested in multimedia solutions, forget about discrete graphics and go with an IGP. At best, they are barely adequate, capable of running the majority of games at 1366x768 and low detail settings. That's fine and ATI is clearly getting design wins, but don't try to convince us that low-end discrete graphics (HD 4330 and GeForce 9300M/G110M, we're looking at you!) are anywhere near being good gaming solutions.
#AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER SERIES#
In short, while ATI has had very compelling performance on the desktop - in fact they have been our recommended solution with the 5000 series, and the 4000 series was very good from a price/performance standpoint - on laptops ATI has been more of a multimedia solution than a gaming solution. ATI in turn has Stream, and DirectCompute and OpenCL are industry standards that will hopefully supersede CUDA and Stream, but for the time being we have to give the GPGPU crown to NVIDIA. And of course, NVIDIA also has CUDA and PhysX to talk about. Frankly, if the Mobility Radeon 5800 series is going to have any chance at winning gamer mindshare, those plans can't come soon enough. (And as a side note, we still haven't seen much in the way of driver updates for that platform!) We asked ATI about this and were told that an improved mobile driver plan should be coming "very soon". This is especially important for CrossFire and SLI solutions, and that's the one area where ATI's Mobility Radeon drivers have been severely lacking. We tested the ASUS W90Vp and found that it can offer compelling performance… when the drivers worked properly. The other big reason that NVIDIA has ruled the high-end of mobile solutions is driver support. Then again, it's difficult to deal with laptop power and cooling constraints. That's good for the manufacturers, but we're not particularly happy that laptops are still less than half the performance of desktop parts. We've seen Gateway, ASUS, Dell, Clevo, and others go from 8800M to 9800M to GTX 260M/280M with very few updates to accommodate the new GPUs.
#AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER UPDATE#
With only minor tweaks to the design, it has been easy for manufacturers to update existing lines with support for new NVIDIA graphics solutions. We're still running G92b cores in the GTX 280M, and the G92 first became available almost 2 years ago with the 8800M series. In contrast, we are only aware of two laptops that shipped with the Mobility Radeon 4870 chips. NVIDIA also sells far more low-end and midrange mobile GPUs than high-end parts, but as far as high-end laptop graphics is concerned, NVIDIA has had a clear lead for a while, for a couple of reasons.įirst, NVIDIA has been very good about OEM/ODM design wins for their fastest GPUs. As for the 4800 series, it's still sitting at less than 5% (with the remainder of ATI's sales apparently coming from older 3000 series parts). 15% of sales are from the 4600 series, which is where reasonable gaming can finally enter the picture.
#AMD MOBILITY RADEON HD 5000 DRIVER FULL#
That of course doesn't tell the full story, and in speaking with ATI we were informed that 70% of sales have been 4300/4500 parts - the lowest performing, least expensive offerings.
0 kommentar(er)
